- Aim/Focus
- Standard organisation
- Good to know
Below is a list of documents and policies that were used in the collection of the scheme data:
REGULATION (EC) No 66/2010 on the EU Ecolabel (25 November 2009) RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE GROUP OF EXPERTS E00374 “European Union Ecolabelling Board (EUEB) Strategic EU Ecolabel Work Plan 2020 - 2024 EU ECOLABEL LOGO GUIDELINES Last updated by the EU Ecolabel Helpdesk: June 2020 EU Ecolabel fees table February 2022
Credibility 78%
-
Availability of Scheme Structure
-
Independence of Scheme Owner from Certificate Holder
-
Availability of Standard
-
Public Consultation of Standard
From March 2025, the required level of ambition for this minimum criterion will increase from 'basic' to 'advanced'.
-
Standard Review
-
Scheme Legal Status
-
Sources of Finance
-
Standard-Setting Process
-
Assessment Methodology
-
Sustainability Goals and Objectives of the Scheme
-
Key Issues
-
Stakeholder Feedback
-
Consistent Interpretation
-
Scheme Accessibility
-
Assurance Provider Complaints and Appeals Mechanism
From March 2025, the required level of ambition for this minimum criterion will increase from 'basic' to 'advanced'.
-
Assessment Reports Availability
-
Scope and Duration of Certificate / License
-
Certified or Verified Enterprise / Labelled Product List
From March 2025, the required level of ambition for this minimum criterion will increase from 'basic' to 'advanced'.
-
Accredited/ Approved Assurance Providers
-
Independent Conformity Assessment
From March 2025, the required level of ambition for this minimum criterion will increase from 'basic' to 'advanced'.
-
Consistent Decision-Making on Conformity
-
Procedure on Non-Conformities
-
Claims and Labelling Policy
-
Scheme Management
-
Governance
-
Does the scheme owner make its organisational structure publicly available, including composition of governance bodies?
Possible answers
- Yes (on request) (0 points)
- Yes publicly (1 point)
- No (0 points)
-
Is the scheme owner a legal entity, or an organization that is a partnership of legal entities, or a government or inter-governmental agency?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Is there a mechanism for stakeholders to participate in scheme development and decision-making?
Possible answers
- Yes available publicly (2 points)
- Yes available on request (1 point)
- No (0 points)
-
Do the voting procedures of the top decision-making body ensure that there is a balanced representation of stakeholder interests, where no single interest predominates?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme owner make quantitative information on the income sources or financing structure of the scheme available?
Possible answers
- Yes (on request) (1 point)
- Yes publicly (2 points)
- No (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner have an internal quality management system available?
Possible answers
- Yes (on request) (1 point)
- Yes publicly (1 point)
- No (0 points)
-
Is the scheme owner economically independent from the certificate holder?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme owner have sustainability-oriented goals and objectives?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme owner have a strategy for meeting its sustainability-oriented goals and objectives?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (on request) (1 point)
- Yes publicly (2 points)
-
Does the scheme owner make its organisational structure publicly available, including composition of governance bodies?
-
Impact
-
Does the scheme owner have a system in place for measuring its impacts and progress towards its sustainability goals?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (on request) (1 point)
- Yes publicly (2 points)
-
Does the scheme owner use the results of monitoring and evaluation for learning and improvements to its programme?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme owner make sustainability results from M&E available?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (on request) (1 point)
- Yes publicly (2 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner have a system in place for measuring its impacts and progress towards its sustainability goals?
-
Complaints Mechanism
-
Does the scheme owner have a publicly available and easily accessible complaints mechanism?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme owner have a publicly available and easily accessible complaints mechanism?
-
Supporting Strategies
-
Does the scheme implement strategies or activities to support improved performance of participating enterprises, e.g. capacity building, access to finance?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not Applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme implement strategies or activities to support improved performance of participating enterprises, e.g. capacity building, access to finance?
-
Governance
-
Standard-Setting
-
Is the standard made publicly available free of charge?
Possible answers
- Yes (on request) (0 points)
- Yes publicly (1 point)
- No (0 points)
-
Has a set of key sustainability issues in the sector where the scheme operates or product lifecycle been defined in the standard-setting process?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Is the standard-setting procedure or a summary of the process for how stakeholders can engage in standard-setting made publicly available?
Possible answers
- Yes (on request) (0 points)
- Yes publicly (1 point)
- No (0 points)
-
Can stakeholders participate in the standard-setting process?
Possible answers
- Members only (1 point)
- Invitation only (1 point)
- All stakeholders (2 points)
-
Are stakeholders who are directly affected by the standard provided opportunities to participate in standard setting?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Are draft standards field tested / piloted for relevance and auditability through the development and revision processes?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner provide information on how the input received from consultations has been included in the final version of the standard?
Possible answers
- Yes (on request) (1 point)
- Yes publicly (2 points)
- No (0 points)
-
Do the voting procedures of the decision-making body responsible for standard setting ensure that there is a balanced representation of stakeholder interests?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Is the standard reviewed and, if necessary, revised at least every 5 years?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme ensure that guidance is in place to support consistent interpretation of the standard?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Are there procedures and guidance for application or interpretation of the standard to regional contexts?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Is the standard made publicly available free of charge?
-
Assurance
-
Assurance System
-
Is there a publicly available documented assessment methodology for assurance providers to assess conformity with the standard?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes available on request (0 points)
- Yes publicly available (1 point)
-
Is application (to get certified/verified) open to all potential applicants within the scope of the scheme?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme owner provide information on assessment fees or require this of assurance providers?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes available on request (1 point)
- Yes publicly available (2 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require assurance providers to have an easily accessible complaints and appeals mechanism?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes available on request (1 point)
- Yes publicly available (2 points)
-
Does the scheme owner make, or require assurance providers to make a summary of certification/verification reports (with personal and commercially sensitive information removed) available?
Possible answers
- No (no reports) (0 points)
- No (confidential) (1 point)
- Yes (on request) (2 points)
- Yes publicly (2 points)
-
Does the certificate or license define the scope of assurance and duration for which it is valid?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme owner maintain or require assurance providers to maintain a publicly accessible list of certified or verified enterprises, or a list of verified products/product groups, or a list of members (in case of membership-based initiatives)?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Yes incl. scope of certificate or license (2 points)
-
Does the scheme owner maintain a current and publicly available list of all accredit-ed/approved/suspended assurance providers?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (on request) (0 points)
- Yes (publicly) (1 point)
-
Does the scheme owner review the effectiveness of their assurance system on a periodic basis?
Possible answers
- Annual (1 point)
- Every 3 years (1 point)
- Every 5 years (1 point)
- Ad hoc (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require that clients and other affected stakeholders are notified of changes to the assurance requirements?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme require performance improvements over time to maintain certification?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme owner have a documented assessment methodology for assurance providers that are assessing chain of custody?
Possible answers
- yes publicly available (2 points)
- yes available on request (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require assurance providers to report to them on complaints received and, on the actions, taken to resolve the issue?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme owner maintain an information management system?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
-
Has the scheme specified equivalence requirements for any other scheme assurance results it recognises?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Is there a publicly available documented assessment methodology for assurance providers to assess conformity with the standard?
-
Conformity Assessment
-
Conformity Assessment Process
-
Does the scheme require a third-party conformity assessment of all clients for compliance with its standard?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (2 points)
- Not Applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner define requirements for decision-making to ensure that assurance providers use consistent procedures for determining the conformity of clients or laboratory testing results with the standard?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require assurance providers to have a procedure in place for how clients are required to address non-conformities, including when a certificate or license is suspended or revoked?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme require a third-party conformity assessment of all clients for compliance with its standard?
-
Sustainability Audits
-
Does the scheme owner have a documented oversight approach that requires assurance providers to be accredited or compliant with ISO/IEC 17065, ISO/IEC 17021, ISO/IEC 17020, ISO/IEC 17025 (for laboratories) requirements, or alternatively to be compliant with the relevant ISEAL Assurance Code requirements?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not Applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require that clients are audited on a regular, recurring basis?
Possible answers
- 1 year or less (1 point)
- 1-2 years (1 point)
- 2-3 years (1 point)
- 4-5 years (1 point)
- 5 years or more (1 point)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Is the frequency or intensity of an audit or oversight assessment based on a risk assessment of the client or assurance provider?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner specify the required intensity for each type of audit and the activities that must be carried out by assurance providers for each of its standards?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not Applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner allow or require assurance providers to do unannounced audits?
Possible answers
- Allowed (1 point)
- Required (2 points)
- Not allowed (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Are auditors and assessors required to seek external stakeholder input during the audit and oversight assessment process?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not Applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require assurance providers to follow a consistent report format?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require that assurance providers and oversight bodies use competent and impartial personnel (other than auditor/assessor/ team) to make decisions on compliance?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner have a documented oversight approach that requires assurance providers to be accredited or compliant with ISO/IEC 17065, ISO/IEC 17021, ISO/IEC 17020, ISO/IEC 17025 (for laboratories) requirements, or alternatively to be compliant with the relevant ISEAL Assurance Code requirements?
-
Group Certification
-
Is the group required to have a shared management system with clear responsibilities for implementation of the system?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner have a mechanism that prescribes and justifies how all sites within a group certification will be audited over time?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Is there a sample size formula and sampling approach to determine the number of group members that is externally verified and how the sample is chosen?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Yes based on risk assessment (2 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Do the requirements on group certification/verification define the conditions under which a group member shall be suspended or removed from a group?
Possible answers
- Member suspended from certification (1 point)
- Member removed from a group (1 point)
- Group suspension (1 point)
- No repercussion (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Is the group required to have a shared management system with clear responsibilities for implementation of the system?
-
Chain of Custody
-
Does the scheme owner require all enterprises that are physically handling the certified product to undergo a CoC audit if the product can be destined for retail sale as a certified, labelled product?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require all enterprises that are physically handling the certified product to undergo a CoC audit if the product can be destined for retail sale as a certified, labelled product?
-
Laboratory Testing
-
In the documented assessment methodology, are test methods either referred to or included?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (on request) (1 point)
- Yes publicly (1 point)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Are there rules on random sampling and testing for the conformity monitoring?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Is there a procedure to deal with non-conforming products manufactured by a client / licensee?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
In the documented assessment methodology, are test methods either referred to or included?
-
Conformity Assessment Process
-
Assessor/ Auditor Competencies
-
Does the scheme owner define the qualifications, competency, the required minimum industry audit experience and training requirements for assurance / oversight assessors?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not Applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner define the qualifications, competency, the required minimum industry audit experience and training requirements for assurance / oversight assessors?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme owner require that assurance provider auditors successfully complete auditor training on a standard that is relevant to the scheme and that is based on ISO 19011, or equivalent?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require that assurance and oversight providers implement a programme to monitor and ensure the continued competence and good performance of assessors and auditors?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner carry out or require assurance providers to carry out calibration activities to ensure that assessors /auditors are aligned?
Possible answers
- Annually (2 points)
- Ad Hoc (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require that assurance providers have a Code of Conduct, or equivalent, and supporting procedures to guide behaviour and actions of assurance providers' personnel and to address misconduct
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner assess potential risks to auditor / assessor impartiality and where warranted, do they require assurance providers and oversight bodies to implement practices to mitigate these risks?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme owner define the qualifications, competency, the required minimum industry audit experience and training requirements for assurance / oversight assessors?
-
Accreditation / Oversight
-
Does the scheme require an oversight mechanism and is it documented?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not Applicable (0 points)
-
Is oversight conducted by a third party independent of the scheme owner and assurance providers?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme define the nature and intensity of oversight activities on assurance providers?
Possible answers
- <1 year (2 points)
- 1 year (2 points)
- 2-3 years (2 points)
- 4-5 years (1 point)
- >5 years (1 point)
- Not applicable (0 points)
- None (0 points)
-
Does the intensity of oversight activities take account of risk factors associated with the assurance providers and their personnel?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner clearly define the application and selection process for assurance providers?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner assess scheme-specific competence when accepting assurance providers that are accredited to other relevant standards (proxy accreditation)?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Yes assess scheme-specific competence (1 point)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme have or require oversight providers to have documented and accessible complaints and appeals mechanisms?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner define or request that oversight providers define how assurance providers have to address non-conformities raised through oversight?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require that summaries of oversight reports (with personal and commercially sensitive information removed) are made publicly available?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (on request) (1 point)
- Yes publicly (2 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require that on-site assessments of assurance providers are included in the oversight cycle?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require that oversight includes reviews of assurance provider performance in the field?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme require an oversight mechanism and is it documented?
-
Assurance System
-
Claims & Traceability
-
Traceability
-
Does the scheme owner have a documented Chain of Custody standard or other traceability requirements that apply to the full supply chain?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes available on request (1 point)
- Yes publicly available (2 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Are there any CoC requirements for non-certified material, in case mixing of certified with uncertified inputs is allowed?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require assurance providers to verify that all enterprises within the chain maintain accurate and accessible records that allow any certified product or batch of products to be traceable from the point of sale to the buyer?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Are companies required to keep CoC records for at least the term of certificate validity?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme have a traceability system that enables checking of product flow between links of the supply chain?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner have a documented Chain of Custody standard or other traceability requirements that apply to the full supply chain?
-
Claims & Labelling
-
Does the scheme owner have documented requirements for the use of its symbols, logos and/or claims related to its scheme and make them publicly available?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- Yes (1 point)
- Not Applicable (0 points)
-
Do claims requirements specify the types of claims that can be made for different types of CoC models, where the scheme owner allows for more than one model?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Are claims and label users required to use unique license numbers or other tracking mechanisms?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme owner require surveillance of the accurate use of claims and labels in the market, including a complaints mechanism to report misuse?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Is the label accompanied by an explanatory text claim or a link to further information?
Possible answers
- Yes (1 point)
- No (0 points)
- Not applicable (0 points)
-
Does the scheme have a procedure that defines specific consequences of misuse of claims and do they also require this of their assurance providers?
Possible answers
- No (0 points)
- yes (1 point)
-
Does the scheme owner have documented requirements for the use of its symbols, logos and/or claims related to its scheme and make them publicly available?
-
Traceability
Environment 76%
-
Aquatic Toxicity
-
Biodegradability of Substances
-
Chemicals harmful to human health
-
Quantity of Packaging
-
Recyclability of Packaging Material
-
Consumer information regarding sustainable use and disposal of product
-
Chemicals
-
Chemical Use
-
Does the standard include criteria on chemicals listed on the REACH Candidate List as substances of very high concern?
Possible answers
- Basic: Restrict use (1 point)
- Advanced: Prohibit use except for defined derogations (2 points)
Excerpt from standard:
No derogation from the exclusion in Article 6(6) of the Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 shall be given concerning substances identified as substances of very high concern and included in the list foreseen in Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 present in mixtures in concentrations higher than 0,010 %.
Referenzdokumente:
"Criterion 5 — Excluded and restricted substances (c) Substances of very high concern (SVHCs)"
-
Does the standard include criteria on ready biodegradability of substances?
Possible answers
- Basic: Monitor and restrict use (1 point)
- Advanced: Prohibit use (2 points)
Excerpt from standard:
(a) Biodegradability of surfactants All surfactants shall be readily degradable (aerobically). All surfactants classified as hazardous to the aquatic environment: Acute Category 1 (H400) Chronic Category 3 (H412), in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 1 ), shall be in addition anaerobically biodegradable. (b) Biodegradability of organic compounds The content of organic substances in the product that are aerobically non- biodegradable (not readily biodegradable, aNBO) or anaerobically non-biodegradable (anNBO) shall not exceed the following limits for the reference dosage: aNBO Product type aNBO (g/kg of laundry) powder/tablets aNBO (g/kg of laundry) liquid, capsules, gel Heavy-duty laundry detergent, colour-safe detergent 1,00 0,45 Light-duty detergent 0,55 0,30 Stain remover (pre-treatment only) 0,10 0,10 anNBO Product type anNBO (g/kg of laundry) powder/tablets anNBO (g/kg of laundry) liquid, capsules, gel Heavy-duty laundry detergent, colour-safe detergent 1,10 0,55 Light-duty detergent 0,55 0,30 Stain remover (pre-treatment only) 0,10 0,10 Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide documentation for the degradability of surfactants, as well as the calculation of aNBO and anNBO for the product. A spreadsheet for calculating aNBO and anNBO values is available on the EU Ecolabel website. For both the degradability of surfactants and the aNBO and anNBO values for organic compounds, reference shall be made to the most updated DID list. For ingoing substances that are not included in Part A of the DID list, the relevant information from literature or other sources, or appropriate test results, showing that they are aerobically and anaerobically biodegradable shall be provided, as described in the Part B of that list. In the absence of documentation for degradability described above, an ingoing substance other than a surfactant may be exempted from the requirement for anaerobic degradability if one of the following three alternatives is fulfilled:
Referenzdokumente:
Criterion 3 — Biodegradability (a) Biodegradability of surfactants (b) Biodegradability of organic compounds
-
Does the standard include criteria on H statements?
Possible answers
- Basic: Restrict use by e.g. a risk based approach (1 point)
- Advanced: Prohibit use with exemptions for some ingredients (2 points)
Excerpt from standard:
The product shall not contain ingoing substances at a concentration limit at or above 0,010 % weight by weight in the final product that meet the criteria for classification as toxic, hazardous to the aquatic environment, respiratory or skin sensitisers, carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction in accordance with Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 and in accordance with the list in Table 2. Where stricter, the generic or specific concentration limits determined in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 shall take precedence. Table 2 Restricted hazard classifications and their categorisation Acute toxicity Categories 1 and 2 Category 3 H300 Fatal if swallowed H301 Toxic if swallowed H310 Fatal in contact with skin H311 Toxic in contact with skin H330 Fatal if inhaled H331 Toxic if inhaled H304 May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways EUH070 Toxic by eye contact Specific target organ toxicity Category 1 Category 2 H370 Causes damage to organs H371 May cause damage to organs H372 Causes damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure H373 May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure Respiratory and skin sensitisation Category 1A/1 Category 1B H317 May cause allergic skin reaction H317 May cause allergic skin reaction H334 May cause allergy or asthma symptoms or breathing difficulties if inhaled H334 May cause allergy or asthma symptoms or breathing difficulties if inhaled Carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction Categories 1A and 1B Category 2 H340 May cause genetic defects H341 Suspected of causing genetic defects H350 May cause cancer H351 Suspected of causing cancer H350i May cause cancer by inhalation H360F May damage fertility H361f Suspected of damaging fertility H360D May damage the unborn child H361d Suspected of damaging the unborn child Carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction Categories 1A and 1B Category 2 H360FD May damage fertility. May damage the unborn child H361fd Suspected of damaging fertility. Suspected of damaging the unborn child H360Fd May damage fertility. Suspected of damaging the unborn child H362 May cause harm to breast fed children H360Df May damage the unborn child. Suspected of damaging fertility Hazardous to the aquatic environment Categories 1 and 2 Categories 3 and 4 H400 Very toxic to aquatic life H412 Harmful to aquatic life with long-lasting effects H410 Very toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects H413 May cause long-lasting effects to aquatic life H411 Toxic to aquatic life with long- lasting effects Hazardous to the ozone layer H420 Hazardous to the ozone layer This criterion does not apply to ingoing substances covered by Article 2(7)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 which set out criteria for exempting substances within Annexes IV and V to that Regulation from the registration, downstream user and evaluation requirements. In order to determine whether that exclusion applies, the applicant shall screen any ingoing substance present at a concentration above 0,010 % weight by weight. Substances and mixtures included in Table 3 are exempted from point (b)(ii) of Criterion 5.
Referenzdokumente:
"Criterion 5 — Excluded and restricted substances (b) Hazardous substances"
-
Does the scheme include criteria on other substances which have impact on human health and the environment?
Possible answers
- Basic: Restrict use (1 point)
- Advanced: Prohibit use (2 points)
Excerpt from standard:
The product shall not contain ingoing substances at a concentration limit at or above 0,010 % weight by weight in the final product that meet the criteria for classification as toxic, hazardous to the aquatic environment, respiratory or skin sensitisers, carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction in accordance with Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 and in accordance with the list in Table 2. Where stricter, the generic or specific concentration limits determined in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 shall take precedence. Table 2 Restricted hazard classifications and their categorisation Acute toxicity Categories 1 and 2 Category 3 H300 Fatal if swallowed H301 Toxic if swallowed H310 Fatal in contact with skin H311 Toxic in contact with skin H330 Fatal if inhaled H331 Toxic if inhaled H304 May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways EUH070 Toxic by eye contact Specific target organ toxicity Category 1 Category 2 H370 Causes damage to organs H371 May cause damage to organs H372 Causes damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure H373 May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure Respiratory and skin sensitisation Category 1A/1 Category 1B H317 May cause allergic skin reaction H317 May cause allergic skin reaction H334 May cause allergy or asthma symptoms or breathing difficulties if inhaled H334 May cause allergy or asthma symptoms or breathing difficulties if inhaled Carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction Categories 1A and 1B Category 2 H340 May cause genetic defects H341 Suspected of causing genetic defects H350 May cause cancer H351 Suspected of causing cancer H350i May cause cancer by inhalation H360F May damage fertility H361f Suspected of damaging fertility H360D May damage the unborn child H361d Suspected of damaging the unborn child Carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction Categories 1A and 1B Category 2 H360FD May damage fertility. May damage the unborn child H361fd Suspected of damaging fertility. Suspected of damaging the unborn child H360Fd May damage fertility. Suspected of damaging the unborn child H362 May cause harm to breast fed children H360Df May damage the unborn child. Suspected of damaging fertility Hazardous to the aquatic environment Categories 1 and 2 Categories 3 and 4 H400 Very toxic to aquatic life H412 Harmful to aquatic life with long-lasting effects H410 Very toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects H413 May cause long-lasting effects to aquatic life H411 Toxic to aquatic life with long- lasting effects Hazardous to the ozone layer H420 Hazardous to the ozone layer This criterion does not apply to ingoing substances covered by Article 2(7)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 which set out criteria for exempting substances within Annexes IV and V to that Regulation from the registration, downstream user and evaluation requirements. In order to determine whether that exclusion applies, the applicant shall screen any ingoing substance present at a concentration above 0,010 % weight by weight. Substances and mixtures included in Table 3 are exempted from point (b)(ii) of Criterion 5.
Referenzdokumente:
"Criterion 5 — Excluded and restricted substances (b) Hazardous substances"
-
Does the standard include criteria on limitations of aquatic toxicity of the product?
Possible answers
- Basic: Limitation of aquatic toxicity (1 point)
- Advanced: Definition of a product specific critical dilution volume (2 points)
Excerpt from standard:
The critical dilution volume (CDV chronic ) of the product shall not exceed the following limits for the reference dosage. Product type Limit CDV (l/kg of laundry) Heavy-duty detergent, colour-safe detergent 31 500 Light-duty detergent 20 000 Stain remover (pre-treatment only) 3 500 Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide the calculation of the CDV chronic of the product. A spreadsheet for calculating the CDV chronic value is available on the EU Ecolabel website. The CDV chronic is calculated for all ingoing substances (i) in the product using the following equation: CDV chronic ¼ X CDV ðiÞ ¼ 1 000 · X dosageðiÞ · DF ðiÞ TF chronic ðiÞ Where: dosage(i): weight (g) of the substance (i) in the reference dose; DF(i): degradation factor for the substance (i); TF chronic (i): chronic toxicity factor for the substance (i). The values of DF(i) and TF chronic (i) shall be as given in the most updated Part A of the DID list. If an ingoing substance is not included in Part A, the applicant shall estimate the values following the approach described in Part B of that list and attaching the associated documentation.
Referenzdokumente:
Criterion 2 — Toxicity to aquatic organisms
-
Does the standard include criteria on the prohibition of microplastic?
Possible answers
Excerpt from standard:
The substances indicated below shall not be included in the product formulation regardless of concentration: {...} Microplastics, {...}
Referenzdokumente:
Criterion 5 — Excluded and restricted substances (a) Specified excluded and restricted substances (i) E x c l u d e d s u b s t a n c e s
-
Does the standard include criteria on the limited use of propellants?
Possible answers
-
Does the standard include criteria on chemicals listed on the REACH Candidate List as substances of very high concern?
-
Chemical Use
-
Water
-
Water use
-
Does the standard include criteria on water consumption in the production phase?
Possible answers
- Basic: Monitor volumes of water consumption over time (1 point)
- Advanced: Monitor water volumes & increase efficiency (2 points)
Excerpt from standard:
Environmental information A text shall appear on the primary packaging indicating the importance of using the correct dosage and the lowest recommended temperature (which shall not be higher than 30 °C) and full loads in order to minimise energy and water consumption and reduce water pollution.)
Referenzdokumente:
Criterion 8
-
Does the standard include criteria on water consumption in the production phase?
-
Water use
-
Inputs
-
Packaging
-
Does the standard include criteria on the quantity of packaging?
Possible answers
- Basic: General requirement to minimize the amount of material used (1 point)
- Advanced: Defined calculations to measure the quantity of packaging (2 points)
Excerpt from standard:
(a) Weight/utility ratio (WUR) The weight/utility ratio (WUR) of the product shall be calculated for the primary packaging only and shall not exceed the following values for the reference dosage. Product type WUR (g/kg of laundry) Powder laundry detergents Laundry detergents in tablets or capsules 1,2 Liquid/gel laundry detergents (not in tablets or capsules) 1,4 Stain remover (pre-treatment only) 1,2 Primary packaging made of more than 80 % of recycled materials is exempted from this requirement. Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide the calculation of the WUR of the product. If the product is sold in different packaging (i.e. with different volumes), the calculation shall be submitted for each packaging size for which the EU Ecolabel shall be awarded. The WUR is calculated as follows: WUR = Σ [(W i + U i )/(D i * R i )] Where: W i : weight (g) of the primary packaging (i); U i : weight (g) of non-post-consumer recycled packaging in the primary packaging (i). U i = W i unless the applicant can prove otherwise; D i : number of reference doses contained in the primary packaging (i); R i : refill index. R i = 1 (packaging is not reused for the same purpose) or R i = 2 (if the applicant can document that the packaging component can be reused for the same purpose and they sell refills). The applicant shall provide a signed declaration of compliance confirming the content of post-consumer recycled material, along with relevant documentation. Packaging is regarded as post-consumer recycled if the raw material used to make the packaging has been collected from packaging manufacturers at the distribution stage or at the consumer stage. (b) Design for recycling Plastic packaging shall be designed to facilitate effective recycling by avoiding potential contaminants and incompatible materials that are known to impede separation or reprocessing or to reduce the quality of recyclate. The label or sleeve, closure and, where applicable, barrier coatings shall not comprise, either singularly or in combination the materials and components listed in Table 4. Pump mechanisms (including in sprays) are exempted from this requirement. Table 4 Materials and components excluded from packaging elements Packaging element Excluded materials and components (*) Label or sleeve — PS label or sleeve in combination with a PET, PP or HDPE bottle — PVC label or sleeve in combination with a PET, PP or HDPE bottle — PETG label or sleeve in combination with a PET bottle — Any other plastic materials for sleeves/labels with a density > 1 g/cm 3 used with a PET bottle — Any other plastic materials for sleeves/labels with a density < 1 g/cm 3 used with a PP or HDPE bottle — Labels or sleeves that are metallised or are welded to a packaging body (in mould labelling) Closure — PS closure in combination a with a PET, HDPE or PP bottle — PVC closure in combination with a PET, PP or HDPE bottle — PETG closures or closure material with a density > 1 g/cm 3 in combination with a PET bottle — Closures made of metal, glass, EVA which are not easily separable from the bottle — Closures made of silicone. Silicone closures with a density < 1 g/cm 3 in combination with a PET bottle and silicone closures with a density > 1 g/cm 3 in combination with PEHD or PP bottle are exempted. — Metallic foils or seals which remain fixed to the bottle or its closure after the product has been opened Barrier coatings Polyamide, functional polyolefins, metallised and light blocking barriers (*) EVA — Ethylene Vinyl Acetate, HDPE — High-density polyethylene, PET — Polyethylene terephtalate, PETG — Polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified, PP — Polypropylene, PS — Polystyrene, PVC — Polyvinylchloride
Referenzdokumente:
Criterion 6 — Packaging (a) Weight/utility ratio (WUR) (b) Design for recycling
-
Does the standard include criteria on the packaging material in order to facilitate recycling?
Possible answers
- Basic: Either recyclability of packaging material OR the use of recycled material in packaging (1 point)
- Advanced: Recyclability of packaging material AND the use of recycled material in packaging (2 points)
Excerpt from standard:
(b) Design for recycling Plastic packaging shall be designed to facilitate effective recycling by avoiding potential contaminants and incompatible materials that are known to impede separation or reprocessing or to reduce the quality of recyclate. The label or sleeve, closure and, where applicable, barrier coatings shall not comprise, either singularly or in combination the materials and components listed in Table 4. Pump mechanisms (including in sprays) are exempted from this requirement. Table 4 Materials and components excluded from packaging elements Packaging element Excluded materials and components (*1) Label or sleeve — PS label or sleeve in combination with a PET, PP or HDPE bottle — PVC label or sleeve in combination with a PET, PP or HDPE bottle — PETG label or sleeve in combination with a PET bottle — Any other plastic materials for sleeves/labels with a density > 1 g/cm3 used with a PET bottle — Any other plastic materials for sleeves/labels with a density < 1 g/cm3 used with a PP or HDPE bottle — Labels or sleeves that are metallised or are welded to a packaging body (in mould labelling) Closure — PS closure in combination a with a PET, HDPE or PP bottle — PVC closure in combination with a PET, PP or HDPE bottle — PETG closures or closure material with a density > 1 g/cm3 in combination with a PET bottle — Closures made of metal, glass, EVA which are not easily separable from the bottle — Closures made of silicone. Silicone closures with a density < 1 g/cm3 in combination with a PET bottle and silicone closures with a density > 1 g/cm3 in combination with PEHD or PP bottle are exempted. — Metallic foils or seals which remain fixed to the bottle or its closure after the product has been opened Barrier coatings Polyamide, functional polyolefins, metallised and light blocking barriers (*1) EVA — Ethylene Vinyl Acetate, HDPE — High-density polyethylene, PET — Polyethylene terephtalate, PETG — Polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified, PP — Polypropylene, PS — Polystyrene, PVC — Polyvinylchloride Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide a signed declaration of compliance specifying the material composition of the packaging including the container, label or sleeve, adhesives, closure and barrier coating, as appropriate, along with photos or technical drawings of the primary packaging. Primary packaging made of more than 80 % of recycled materials is exempted from this requirement. factor Ui is defined as “weight (g) of non-post-consumer recycled packaging in the primary packaging (i). Ui = Wi unless the applicant can prove otherwise;” . This means that you have to add the weight of the packaging in the numerator of the formula ONLY if the packaging is NON- RECYCLED
Referenzdokumente:
criterion 6. B (packaging- design for recycling) part a) of criterion 6 : Weight/utility ratio (WUR)
-
Does the standard include criteria on the quantity of packaging?
-
Packaging
-
Energy & Climate
-
Climate Change Mitigation
-
Does the standard include criteria on energy consumption in the production phase?
Possible answers
- Basic: Monitor energy consumption over time (1 point)
- Advanced: Increase efficiency OR increase use of renewables (2 points)
-
Does the standard include criteria on energy consumption in the production phase?
-
Climate Change Mitigation
-
Waste and Air Pollution
-
Waste Management
-
Does the standard include criteria on volumes of waste?
Possible answers
- Basic (0 points)
- Advanced: Reduction of volumes of waste (1 point)
-
Does the scheme include criteria on consumer information on the sustainable use and disposal of the product?
Possible answers
- Basic: Information provided to consumers on the disposal of the product (0 points)
- Advanced: Consumer information on the sustainable use of the product (1 point)
Excerpt from standard:
The product shall be accompanied by instructions for proper use so as to maximise product performance, minimise waste, and reduce water pollution and use of resources. These instructions shall be legible or include graphical representation or icons and include information on the following: (a) Dosing instructions The applicant shall take suitable steps to help consumers respect the recommended dosage, making available the dosing instructions and a convenient dosage system (e.g. caps). Dosage instructions shall include information on the recommended dosage for a standard load for at least two levels of soiling and on the impact of the water hardness on the dosing. Indications of the most prevalent water hardness in the area where the product is intended to be marketed or where this information can be found shall be provided. (b) Packaging disposal information The primary packaging shall include information on the reuse, recycling and correct disposal of packaging. (c) Environmental information A text shall appear on the primary packaging indicating the importance of using the correct dosage and the lowest recommended temperature (which shall not be higher than 30 °C) and full loads in order to minimise energy and water consumption and reduce water pollution. Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide a signed declaration of compliance along with a sample of the product label.
Referenzdokumente:
Criterion 8 — User information
-
Does the standard include criteria on volumes of waste?
-
Waste Management
-
Environmental Management
-
Does the standard include criteria on environmental policy or management instruments (like EMAS or ISO 14001)?
Possible answers
- Basic: Verification (self-declaration) of final manufacturing plant (1 point)
- Advanced: Certification (third party) of final manufacturing plant (2 points)
-
Does the standard include criteria on environmental policy or management instruments (like EMAS or ISO 14001)?
-
Quality
-
Quality and Suitability
-
Does the standard include criteria on the fitness for use of the product for the intended purpose?
Possible answers
Excerpt from standard:
The product shall have a satisfactory wash performance at the lowest temperature and dosage recommended by the manufacturer for the water hardness in accordance with ‘EU Ecolabel protocol for testing laundry detergents’ ( 1 ) or ‘EU Ecolabel protocol for testing stain removers’ ( 2 ), as appropriate, available on the EU Ecolabel website. Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide documentation demonstrating that the product has been tested under the conditions specified in the protocol and that the results showed that the product achieved at least the minimum wash performance required. The applicant shall also provide documentation demonstrating compliance with the laboratory requirements included in the relevant harmonised standards for testing and calibration laboratories, if appropriate. An equivalent test performance may be used if equivalence has been assessed and accepted by the competent body.
Referenzdokumente:
Criterion 7 — Fitness for use
-
Does the standard include criteria on the fitness for use of the product for the intended purpose?
-
Quality and Suitability
Socio-Economic 8%
-
Verification of Core Labour Standards along the Supply Chain
-
Equal Opportunities
-
CSR Strategy
-
Labour Rights and Working Conditions
-
ILO Core Conventions
-
Does the standard require compliance with (at least) all ILO core labour standards for different suppliers along the supply chain?
Possible answers
- Basic: Main tier 1 suppliers (1 point)
- Advanced: All tier 1 suppliers (2 points)
-
Does the standard include criteria on occupational health and safety, as defined in ILO 155?
Possible answers
- Basic: Partial compliance with ILO 155 (1 point)
- Advanced: Full compliance with ILO 155 (2 points)
-
Does the standard require compliance with (at least) all ILO core labour standards for different suppliers along the supply chain?
-
ILO Core Conventions
-
Business Practice and Ethical Issues
-
Economic Development and Fair Business Practice
-
Does the standard include a requirement for compliance with relevant local, regional and national laws and regulations?
Possible answers
Excerpt from standard:
As a prerequisite, the product shall meet all applicable legal requirements of the country or countries in which the product is intended to be placed on the market. The applicant shall declare the product's compliance with this requirement.
Referenzdokumente:
ASSESSMENT AND VERIFICATION (a) Requirements
-
Does the standard include a requirement for compliance with relevant local, regional and national laws and regulations?
-
Corruption and Bribery
-
Does the standard include criteria on the prevention of corruption and bribery?
Possible answers
- Basic: Corruption and bribery is prohibited (1 point)
- Advanced (0 points)
-
Does the standard include criteria on the prevention of corruption and bribery?
-
Economic Development and Fair Business Practice
-
Company Responsibility
-
Company Responsibility in Europe
-
Does the standard require the implementation of measures that aim at generating equal economic opportunities for women and men?
Possible answers
-
Does the standard require the definition of a company-wide CSR strategy?
Possible answers
- Basic: A CSR strategy is defined (1 point)
- Advanced: CSR strategy is publicly available (2 points)
-
Does the standard include criteria on community engagement?
Possible answers
-
Does the standard include requirements on measures that aim at managing demographic change?
Possible answers
-
Does the standard require the implementation of measures that aim at generating equal economic opportunities for women and men?
-
Impact Assessment
-
Does the standard include criteria on assessing the impacts of operations on human rights?
Possible answers
- Basic: Human Rights Impact Assessment OR Social Impact Assessment (1 point)
- Advanced: Human Rights Impact Assessment AND Social Impact Assessment (2 points)
-
Does the standard include criteria on assessing the impacts of operations on human rights?
-
Company Responsibility in Europe